QS-108

Corrective and Preventative Action (CAPA)

Section QS — Quality System Revision 4 9 pages

Original Document

Scanned document (image-only PDF)

Extracted Text

Searchable text extracted from PDF

1.0 Purpose 
 
 This procedure provides a method for implementing and tracking corrective and/or preventive
 
 action to take to eliminate causes of non-conformities or other undesirable situations.
 
 2.0 Scope 
 
 This procedure applies to CAPA in response to exception data (see Section 6.1.1) and non-
 exception data (see Section 6.1.2). This procedure applies to all Ion Labs’ products, processes
 or systems associated with cGMP requirements or ISO 17025 laboratory requirements.
 
 3.0 Responsibilities 
 
 3.1 It is the responsibility of individuals assigned to complete a CAPA to:
 
 3.1.1. Review and understand the source of the CAPA (i.e. the event or situation that
 created the need for the CAPA 
 
 3.1.2 Review and understand the root cause analysis leading to the CAPA
 
 3.1.3 Execute the CAPA plan 
 
 3.1.4 Initiate Effectiveness Checks as applicable 
 
 3.1.5 Initiate closure of the CAPA when the CAPA plan is completed
 
 3.2 Itis the responsibility of Quality Management to: 
 
 3.2.1 Approve and Reject CAPA plans and CAPA forms 
 
 3.2.2 Implement, execute, and maintain this procedure. 
 
 3.3 Itis the responsibility of Document Control (DC) to: 
 
 3.3.1 Process CAPA forms. 
 
 3.3.2 Monitor open CAPA and report open and late CAPAs. 
 
 

[SOP 

 Standard Operating Procedure SOP No | Rev 
 Corrective and Preventative Action (CAPA) QS-108 4 Page 2 of 7 
 
 4.0 References 
 
 4.1 QS-108-F1, Form, Corrective Action Preventative Action (CAPA) Assignment
 
 4.2 QS-108-F2, Form, Corrective Action Preventative Action (CAPA) Closure
 
 4,3 QS-112, SOP, Core Quality Systems and Quality Events 
 
 4.4 QS-112-F1, Form, Quality Event Extension Request 
 
 4.5 QS-112-F2, Form, Quality Event Cancellation Request 
 
 4.6 QS-112-F3, Form, Quality Event Amendment Request 
 
 4.7 C-201, SOP, Deviation and Investigation Procedure 
 
 4.8 D-105, SOP, Out of Specification / Out of Trend Investigation 
 
 4.9 C-403, SOP, Change Control Procedure 
 
 4.10 H-101, SOP, Internal Audits 
 
 4.11 QS-101, SOP, Complaints 
 
 4.12 QS-107, SOP, Recall Procedure 
 
 4.13 QS-111, SOP, Root Cause Analysis 
 
 4.14 QS-114, SOP, Quality Risk Management 
 
 4.15 QS-113, SOP, Effectiveness Checks 
 
 5.0 Definitions 
 
 5.1 CAPA — Corrective and Preventive Action (also known as Corrective Action /
 Preventative Action) consists of improvements to processes take to eliminate causes of
 non-conformities or other undesirable situations. 
 
 5.2 Corrective Action (CA) - Action taken to permanently correct and prevent recurrence
 of nonconforming product and other quality system problems. 
 
 5.3 Preventative Action (PA) - Action taken to eliminate the cause of potential
 
 nonconformities to prevent occurrence before they happen. These types of actions
 anticipate potential problems and eliminate the most likely causes of the problem so
 they are less likely to occur in all areas of operation. 
 
 

[SOP 

 Standard Operating Procedure SOP No | Rev 
 Corrective and Preventative Action (CAPA) Qe ls : Page Sot 
 
 5.4 | DC — Document Control 
 
 5.5 CQS-— Core Quality System(s) is a system (i.e. Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) or
 combination of SOPs) that handle and manage a quality event and that are within the
 scope of SOP QS=112 Core Quality Systems and Events. NOTE: There are Quality
 Systems outside the scope of QS-112 that handle Quality Events; however, they do not
 
 meet this definition of CQS. 
 
 5.6 Quality Event — An event that triggers the use of a CQS and that is subject to cGMP
 regulations. 
 
 5.7 eGMP — Current Good Manufacturing Practices as defined by regulations associated
 with the manufacture, testing, holding, etc. of a food, dietary supplement, drug product,
 
 or device manufactured by Ion Labs. 
 
 5.8 OOS — Out of Specification —a result for a test performed does not meet established
 acceptance criteria. 
 
 5.9 OOT — Out of Trend — a result for a test performed that meets established acceptance
 criteria, but is not statistically consistent with historical trends.
 
 5.10 AR-— Aberrant Result —a result for a test performed that meets established acceptance
 
 criteria, but is considered atypical, abnormal, anomalous, deviant, irregular,
 questionable, or unexpected. 
 
 1.1 Adverse Event — Any health-related event associated with the use of a cosmetic,
 dietary supplement, or OTC that is adverse. 
 
 1.2 Serious Adverse Event — Results in death, a life-threatening experience, inpatient
 
 hospitalization, a persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital
 anomaly/birth defect, or one that requires medical or surgical intervention to prevent
 such serious outcomes. 
 
 6.0 Procedure 
 
 6.1 CAPA Sources 
 
 6.1.1 Initiate CAPA in response to exception data (i.e. Quality Events that negatively
 affect the quality of components, materials, products, procedures or systems).
 These CAPA sources include, but are not limited to: 
 
 6.1.1.1 Complaints - SOP QS-101 
 
 6.1.1.2 Deviations —SOP C-201 
 
 

[SOP 

 Standard Operating Procedure SOP No | Rev 
 Corrective and Preventative Action (CAPA) QS-108 4 Page 4 of 7 
 
 6.1.1.3 OOS —SOP D-105 
 
 6.1.1.4 Audits (including technical and laboratory system audits) or FDA
 Inspections 
 
 6.1.1.5 Product rejections / non-conformities 
 
 6.1.1.6 Recalls 
 
 6.1.2 Initiate CAPA in response to non-exception data such as: 
 
 6.1.2.1 Data trending and holistic data reviews 
 
 6.1.2.2 Continuous improvement projects 
 
 6.1.2.3 Industry and regulatory surveillance 
 
 6.2 CAPA Process 
 
 6.2.1 Root Cause Analysis 
 
 6.2.1.1 Effective root cause analysis is critical before an effective CAPA is
 
 determined. SOP QS-111, Root Cause Analysis, provides instruction
 for conducting Root Cause analysis. 
 
 6.2.1.2 Root Cause analysis may identify multiple causes in addition to
 finalizing on a root cause. Generate separate CAPA to address
 multiple causes as applicable. 
 
 6.2.2 Risk Management / Risk Assessment 
 
 6.2.2.1 Use risk management tools as applicable to prioritize possible causes,
 and potential CAPA. SOP QS-114 provides instruction and tools for
 conducting Risk Management activities. 
 
 6.2.3 CAPA Plan 
 
 6.2.3.1 A CAPA plan identifies actions that eliminate and/or minimize risk
 associated with identified causes of a non-conformity or other
 
 undesirable event. 
 
 6.2.3.2 Assign effort, resources, and timelines proportional to identified risk
 levels. 
 
 

[SOP 

 Standard Operating Procedure SOP No | Rev 
 Corrective and Preventative Action (CAPA) QS-108 4 Page 5 of 7 
 
 6.2.4 Effectiveness Check 
 
 6.2.4.1 Assign an Effectiveness Check to CAPA as applicable, even if a
 CAPA number is not required. SOP QS-113, Effectiveness Checks,
 provides instruction for conducting Effectiveness Checks.
 
 6.3 CAPA Documentation 
 
 6.3.1 Laboratory CAPAs must follow section 6.3.4. The CAPA must be documented
 and assigned a the unique CAPA number. 
 
 6.3.2 CAPA Immediately Executed 
 
 6.3.2.1 For CAPA executed immediately and/or closed before closure of the
 source event, the CAPA does not require a CAPA number. 
 
 6.3.2.2 Assigna CAPA number only if it is helpful to have the CAPA number
 
 for reference and documentation purposes (see Section 6.4 for
 assignment details). 
 
 6.3.3 CAPA Pending Execution 
 
 6.3.3.1 For CAPA that are not complete before closure of the source event, a
 CAPA number must be assigned (see Section 6.4 for assignment
 
 details) 
 
 6.3.3.2 Detail the CAPA plan on form QS-108-F1 and assign the CAPA to an
 individual / department for completion 
 
 6.3.4 CAPA To Be Determined 
 
 6.3.4.1 For CAPA that are not complete before closure of the source event and
 / or if the CAPA plan is not determined, a CAPA number must be
 
 assigned (see Section 6.4 for assignment details) 
 
 6.3.4.2 Assign the CAPA to an individual / department for completion using
 form QS-108-F1. 
 
 6.3.4.3 Instead of a CAPA plan, indicate the need to complete root cause
 analysis and to identify a CAPA plan in the CAPA plan section of the
 form. For Laboratory CAPA’s the plan section of the form will
 
 include the evaluation for the need for action to ensure that
 nonconformities do not recur, and where warranted determines a
 corrective action that will eliminate the root cause(s), thereby ensuring
 
 

[SOP 

 Standard Operating Procedure SOP No | Rev 
 Corrective and Preventative Action (CAPA) QS-108 d= | ease bony 
 
 that the problem does not recur or occur elsewhere. Appropriate error-
 proofing methods (including those preventing human error) are
 applied, as applicable. 
 
 6.4 CAPA Assignment / Closure 
 
 6.4.1 Initiate / Assign a CAPA by submitting form QS-108-F1 to DC.
 
 6.4.2 Close a CAPA by submitting form QS-108-F2 to DC. 
 
 6.5 Additional Requirements from QS-112 
 
 6.5.1 This procedure is considered a Core Quality System (CQS) that is also
 controlled by the CQS and Quality Events SOP (QS-112). 
 
 6.5.2 The term “event” is a generic reference to any of the CQS covered by SOP QS-
 112. The term “event” is used interchangeably with specific CQS events as
 
 applicable (i.e. “CAPA” here). 
 
 6.5.3 SOP QS-112 provides instructions common to all Ion Labs CQS including the
 following topics which are not be duplicated here: 
 
 ® Assignment of unique event numbers (i.e. CAPA numbers) 
 
 ® Logging of events with Document Control 
 
 ® Assignment of event due dates 
 
 ® Event due date extensions 
 
 & Event cancellation 
 
 @ Event Revision / Amendment 
 
 8 Monitoring of open events 
 
 ® Record management and retention instructions 
 
 6.6 Laboratory CAPA Trend Reporting 
 
 6.6.1 The Quality Manager submits information regarding corrective action activities
 for management review. Such information may include a description of actions
 taken; the processes from which they originated, the status of such actions, and
 may include further review of their effectiveness. Where there are too many
 
 actions for individual review a summary will be presented. 
 
 

[SOP 

 Standard Operating Procedure SOP No Rev 
 Corrective and Preventative Action (CAPA) QS-108 Page 7 of 7 
 
 6.6.2 Management Review will also be used to assess the overall process for timeliness
 of actions initiated and timeliness of actions taken for corrective actions in the
 Laboratory Management System. 
 
 7.0 Revision History 

| Rev | Date | Description of Changes | CCR # | By |
|-----|----------|------------------------|-------|----|
| 0 | 06/23/14 | New. 02/09/15 Revise to include 21 CFR 210 and 211. 15-0055 D. Popp | 14-0521 | D. Popp |
| 2 | 02/09/15 | Added reference to quality system extension request form. | 17-0916 | S. Millar |
| 3 | 01/14/20 | mais reflect forms QS-108-F1 and QS-108-F2 and reference | 19-0603 | K. Burris |
| 4 | 11/04/21 | Added requirements for ISO 17025:2017 for laboratory CAPAs. CC- | 21-0412 | J. Sassman |

 

[SOP 

 JANLABS Corrective And Preventative Action (CAPA) Assignment
 
 Form: QS-108-F 1 CCRNo. CC-21-0412 Revision: 2 
 
 CAPA Number (assigned by Document Control after the rest of this form is completed)
 
 Revision # 
 
 CAPA - Title / Description 
 
 CAPA Source / Reference 
 (i.e. RPT #, DEV #, INV#, etc.) 
 
 Event Dates 
 CAPA CAPA 
 Open Date Due Date 
 
 CAPA-— Owner (i.e. Assigned to) 
 
 CAPA Plan / Comments 
 LIN/A | 0 
 
 Title / Name Signature Date 
 
 Completed By: 
 
 Assignment Accepted By: 
 CL] N/A if same as completed by 
 Approved By (Quality): 
 
 

[SOP 

 IANLABS Corrective And Preventative Action (CAPA) Closure
 Form: QS-108-F2 CCRNo. CC-21-0412 Revision: 2 
 
 CAPA Number 
 
 Revision # 
 
 CAPA — Title / Description 
 
 CAPA Source / Reference 
 (i.e. RPT #, DEV #, INV#, etc.) 
 
 DATE INFORMATION 
 
 Closed Date 
 
 CLOSURE SUMMARY 
 
 Include as applicable: Evidence and/or statement of closure, cross references to supporting documentation,
 general conclusions / outcome, etc. 
 
 Title / Name Signature Date 
 
 Completed By: 
 
 Approved By (Quality):